What Problem is Menlo Solving?
The problem in Humanoid robotics is not building humanoid robots: most well-funded teams can build a pretty good prototype.
The hard, venture-scale problem is making humanoids operationally deployable and economically inevitable:
- across a wide range of use cases,
- by a wide range of users,
- at a price point that makes them a no-brainer economic decision.
Key Bottlenecks
In practice, that means collapsing four bottlenecks that currently prevent humanoids from becoming a reliable labour force:
1. Agent-Style Abstractions Missing
The AI agent boom has spawned millions of developers building high-level autonomy—personality, goals, reasoning, decision-making. Robotics is still stuck in the old paradigm: ROS2, motor controls, low-level implementation details.
- No abstraction layer between “what” the robot should do and “how” its motors move
- ROS2 focuses on motor control, not agent-style autonomy
- Developers building personality, goals, and reasoning have no entry point into robotics
- The explosion of agent development talent can’t flow into embodied systems
This means robotics remains gated to a narrow specialist community while the broader software ecosystem watches from the sidelines.
2. No “PC Standard” for Humanoids
Humanoid robotics lacks a “Windows + PC” equivalent—each vendor ships vertically integrated stacks with proprietary hardware and software. This means:
- No abstraction layer between software and hardware
- No ability to write once and run on any humanoid
- No commoditization, where factories compete on actuator prices and supply chains benefit from volume
The result is vendor lock-in and an ecosystem frozen in high-cost, low-volume infancy.
3. Slow Iteration
Robotics lacks mature simulation infrastructure, making iteration expensive and slow.
- No mature simulation or debugging tools
- Real-world failures are costly—in time, money, and hardware
- Months of work can pass before discovering something doesn’t work, with significant investment already sunk
- Quick prototyping and validation is impossible without mature tooling
The result is a slow-moving, capex-heavy industry that constrains overall market growth.
4. Vertically Integrated, Closed Supply Chain
Today’s humanoids are vertically integrated with permissioned, closed-loop supply chains. No standardization means no competition—actuators, parts, and repair are locked to specific vendors.
- No standardized parts, so actuators and components have no commodity pricing
- Closed supply chains are permissioned, not open or permissionless
- No local repair networks—simple fixes require returning units to the vendor
- Vertically integrated stacks keep prices high and innovation gated
This means the industry remains expensive and fragile, with no competitive supply chain ecosystem momentum driving costs down.
Every well-funded competitor can build a robot. Almost none can deploy them reliably at scale to do economically valuable work. That’s where we focus.